The Union Edge

Labor News · Workers' Rights · Workplace Policy

Tech Workers Are Unionizing — Why Silicon Valley Is Organizing

The most anti-union industry in America is becoming one of its most active organizing fronts. That sentence would have gotten you laughed out of a San Francisco coffee shop a decade ago. Software engineers making $200,000 a year don't need unions, the thinking went.

The Union Edge Staff··8 min read·1,911 words
Tech Workers Are Unionizing — Why Silicon Valley Is Organizing

Tech Workers Are Unionizing — and Silicon Valley's Culture War With Itself Has Only Just Begun

The most anti-union industry in America is becoming one of its most active organizing fronts. That sentence would have gotten you laughed out of a San Francisco coffee shop a decade ago. Software engineers making $200,000 a year don't need unions, the thinking went. Free lunches, stock options, and ping-pong tables were supposed to be enough. But a wave of mass layoffs, ethical reckonings, and a widening gap between executives and everyone else has shattered that assumption. The tech workers union movement isn't a fringe experiment anymore. It's a structural shift, and it's accelerating.

I've spent the better part of my career in and around tech companies, and I'll admit something: for years, I bought the story. I believed the industry was fundamentally different from manufacturing or transportation or healthcare. Workers here were "team members." Managers were "servant leaders." The whole vocabulary was designed to make you forget you were an employee with interests that might conflict with your employer's. That vocabulary is crumbling.

The Myth That Kept Unions Out

Silicon Valley runs on a particular ideology. Call it techno-libertarianism, call it the founder myth, call it whatever you want. The core idea is that individual talent and market forces sort everything out fairly. You're not a worker, you're a builder. You don't have a boss, you have a collaborator. You don't need collective bargaining because your GitHub profile is your bargaining power.

This framing has been extraordinarily effective at discouraging collective action. Margaret O'Mara, a professor at the University of Washington and historian of Silicon Valley, put it simply: "Tech saw itself as a different type of corporate environment." And for a long time, enough workers bought in to make it true. When you're 26, your stock is vesting, and your company just IPO'd, the idea of paying union dues feels absurd.

But here's what that myth obscures: the tech industry has always had a working class. Contract assemblers in the 1970s and 80s. Janitors. Cafeteria staff. Security guards. Shuttle bus drivers. These workers kept the campuses running while earning close to minimum wage, often with no medical insurance and no benefits at all. The decline in living standards for contract workers was the quiet underside of Silicon Valley's golden age.

The resistance to that two-tier economy started exactly where you'd expect: at the bottom.

Blue-Collar Workers Lit the Match

Before a single software engineer filed a union card, the people cooking their lunches and guarding their lobbies were already organizing. In 2018, food service workers at Facebook joined with UNITE HERE Local 19 to ratify their first union contract. Security guards won their own contract with help from the Service Employees International Union. Shuttle bus drivers for Facebook, employed by contractor Loop Transportation, secured a collective bargaining agreement that Facebook itself had to approve.

These weren't symbolic gestures. They were material victories for workers earning a fraction of what the engineers sitting next to them took home. And they proved something important: organizing in tech was possible. The sky didn't fall. The campuses didn't shut down. The companies adapted.

The Silicon Valley Rising coalition brought together Teamsters, SEIU, Communications Workers of America, UNITE-HERE, and community organizations with a specific target: that two-tiered economy where billion-dollar companies outsource labor to contractors who compete by cutting wages to the bone. This pattern will sound familiar if you've followed how labor disputes play out in other industries where contract workers bear the brunt of cost-cutting while the parent company claims clean hands.

Then the Engineers Started Paying Attention

Then the Engineers Started Paying Attention — Tech Workers Are Unionizing — Why Silicon Valley Is Organizing
Then the Engineers Started Paying Attention — Tech Workers Are Unionizing — Why Silicon Valley Is Organizing

The shift from blue-collar to white-collar tech organizing didn't happen because engineers suddenly developed class consciousness over brunch. It happened because the industry broke its own promises.

Mass layoffs swept through tech starting in late 2022 and continued through 2024. Companies that had spent years telling employees they were "family" cut tens of thousands of workers over email. Ethical controversies piled up: AI systems being developed for military applications, surveillance tools sold to authoritarian governments, algorithmic management systems that treated warehouse workers like interchangeable parts. And the compensation gap between C-suite executives and everyone else grew obscene even by Silicon Valley standards.

Workers started asking a question the industry's culture had trained them never to ask: what power do I actually have here?

The answer, increasingly, was collective power.

In 2021, workers at the Alphabet Workers Union organized across Google's parent company, including both full-time employees and contractors. That same year, public unionization drives launched at companies including Mobilize, Medium, NPR, Catalist, Change.org, EveryAction, and the New York Times tech staff. Several civic tech companies received voluntary recognition from their employers, a sign that not every company was willing to fight the tide.

CODE-CWA, the Campaign to Organize Digital Employees under the Communications Workers of America, became the institutional backbone for much of this activity. They supported workers at Activision Blizzard by filing unfair labor practice charges with the NLRB. They helped organize at Glitch, Blue State Digital, and even tabletop game developer Paizo. The definition of "tech worker" expanded beyond coders to include anyone whose labor powers the digital economy.

What Makes Tech Labor Organizing Different

Having watched this movement develop, I think there are three things that make it genuinely distinct from organizing in traditional industries.

The Ethics Dimension

Tech workers aren't just organizing for better pay. Many campaigns have been driven by moral objections to what their companies are building. The "No Tech for Apartheid" campaign, opposition to AI weapons systems, pushback against surveillance tools for authoritarian regimes. These aren't standard labor grievances. They represent workers demanding a say in what their labor produces, not just how it's compensated.

This is new territory for labor law, which was built around wages, hours, and working conditions. When a machine learning engineer says "I refuse to build a facial recognition system for immigration enforcement," that's a different kind of demand than asking for overtime pay. But it's rooted in the same principle: workers should have a voice in how their work is used.

The Contractor Problem

Tech's reliance on contractors and subcontractors creates organizing challenges that would make a traditional union organizer's head spin. A single Google campus might employ workers from dozens of different staffing agencies, each with different pay scales, benefits, and employment terms. The company that controls your daily work isn't technically your employer.

The NLRB's evolving standards on joint-employer liability are starting to close this loophole. If a tech company controls the working conditions of contractor employees, it may be held accountable for their labor practices. This legal shift puts pressure on companies to either bring workers in-house or accept that their support workers have a right to organize regardless of whose name is on the paycheck.

The Remote Work Wrinkle

Distributed teams make organizing both harder and easier. Harder because you can't build solidarity in hallway conversations. Easier because digital tools let you coordinate across geographies in ways physical workplaces never could. Platforms like Turkopticon and Dynamo have enabled gig workers to build visibility and coordinate actions without ever being in the same room.

But the relational work still matters most. As one tech worker-organizer put it in a 2025 study: "The actual thing that does the work is not a skill that you'd learn as a software engineer. It's one-on-ones. It's really deeply understanding your coworkers." The irony of an industry built on communication technology discovering that organizing requires old-fashioned human conversation is not lost on me.

The Pushback Is Real

The Pushback Is Real — Tech Workers Are Unionizing — Why Silicon Valley Is Organizing
The Pushback Is Real — Tech Workers Are Unionizing — Why Silicon Valley Is Organizing

None of this is happening without fierce resistance. Tech companies have deployed the full playbook: mandatory anti-union meetings, hiring union avoidance consultants, reclassifying workers, and leaning hard on the cultural narrative that unions are for factory workers, not knowledge workers.

One tech executive's quote from the KQED archives captures the attitude perfectly: "If we had the work rules that unionized companies have, we'd all go out of business." That line has been repeated in various forms for decades. And yet unionized companies across every sector continue to exist and profit.

The retaliation can be subtler in tech than in other industries. Instead of firing organizers outright, companies restructure teams, adjust performance reviews, or simply eliminate positions. The at-will employment doctrine that governs most tech work makes it trivially easy to push out workers who cause friction, and proving that a termination was retaliatory rather than performance-based is notoriously difficult.

If you're involved in organizing at a tech company, document everything. Keep records of your performance reviews, communications with management, and any changes to your role or responsibilities. This documentation is your protection if retaliation occurs.

What's Actually Working

The campaigns that succeed tend to share a few common traits.

  1. Workplace mapping before going public. Successful organizers spend weeks or months surveying employee sentiment and identifying supporters before making any public moves. One organizer described it bluntly: "Without data, you just can't effectively organize without that high-level view of things."

  2. Cross-role solidarity. The most durable efforts unite engineers, designers, QA analysts, customer support staff, and contract workers under a shared identity. When only one job function organizes, companies can isolate and neutralize the effort.

  3. Institutional backing. Independent, company-specific organizing has its advantages, but campaigns supported by established unions like CWA, SEIU, or UNITE-HERE tend to have more staying power. They bring legal expertise, funding, and strategic knowledge that first-time organizers lack. Ethan Marcotte's book, "You Deserve a Tech Union," which the Emergency Workplace Organizing Committee has highlighted, provides practical steps for workers considering this path.

  4. Starting with concrete grievances. Abstract ideological arguments about labor rights rarely move people who are comfortable. Specific issues like opaque layoff criteria, unequal contractor treatment, or mandatory return-to-office policies generate the kind of anger that turns skeptics into supporters.

Where This Goes From Here

Silicon Valley unionizing isn't a passing trend driven by pandemic-era frustration. The structural conditions that created this movement haven't changed. If anything, they've intensified. AI is automating work that engineers once considered untouchable. Companies continue to treat mass layoffs as routine cost optimization. And the gap between what tech executives earn and what everyone else takes home keeps widening.

Public support for unions sits near historic highs. Younger workers entering the tech workforce don't carry the same anti-union cultural baggage as previous generations. And every successful campaign makes the next one easier by proving it can be done.

So what does tech labor organizing look like in five years? I don't think every tech company will be unionized. That's not realistic, and honestly, not every workplace needs a formal union structure. But I do think the norms are shifting permanently. Workers across the industry are starting to see themselves as workers, with interests that sometimes diverge from their employers'. That shift in self-perception is the foundation everything else gets built on.

If you work in tech and you've been watching this from the sidelines, here's the practical takeaway: talk to your coworkers. Not about union cards or labor law. Just about working conditions, about what's fair and what isn't, about whether the promises your company made are being kept. That conversation is where every organizing effort in history has started. The tech industry isn't exempt from that pattern. It never was.

T

The Union Edge Staff

Also in the paper